It’s been a couple of years since I’ve been camping in Albany… *cough* 21 *cough* and it’s somewhere I’ve been wanting to take the kids so we booked into a park on Emu point for mid January.
We had a great time down there and the kids were so good during the travel. When we went to Hamlin Bay in 2009 and Pemberton last year we made a lot of stops along the way but there’s really not a lot to see along the Albany Highway so I aimed to make as few stops as possible.
Portable DVD players and DS consoles worked a treat and we only stopped once on the way down and not at all on the way back. All 4 were very well behaved.
Yes, we all know the accepted countdown ‘threat’ that parents use on small children so it was mildly amusing to hear someone in the next aisle from us in the supermarket start from ten and count backwards.
Even funnier that, after they’d said eight they said “fine, I’m leaving”.
That’s another great ploy to motivate pre-schoolers but not even half way through a countdown? I suspect that’s going to either be one confused child or at the very least someone who doesn’t complete what they sta…
It’s been such a long time since I’ve done a Photo Friday but now that I’ve finally got my site back under control and the permalinks are where I intend them to remain, I felt it was a good time to put one up.
So what do I place as a “best” photo for 2010 – Difficult for a couple of reasons. Firstly, I really haven’t put much up on this site in the last couple of years so to pick one photo out of many that I’d like to use is tough, and secondly – It’s also tough trying to prise my camera from the hands of my wife to actually take some photographs :P
So I’ll go with two, which is probably not quite in the spirit of the meme but what the heck.
We went out on New Years Eve but not until late and that gave me some time to build the WordPress template. I’ve built quite a few since Version 3 came out in the middle of 2010 and I’m getting quicker at translating my layouts into a working template.
With the template done I installed the latest version of WP into the root directory and adjusted the settings to reflect the new home and everything is now working.
I have spent a fair chunk of new years day going through my posts and updating the photographs as I intend to delete the current Plogger system. I have now completed all posts up to the beginning of 2007 but seeing as the vast bulk of my blogging was prior to 2006 I still have a long way to go.
I’m essentially going backwards through my posts and correcting links and images as I find errors but as my permalink structure is now how I’m intending it to remain I can continue to update and add new posts.
I don’t expect to be blogging with the frequency that I was doing 6 or 7 years ago, those days have passed, given way to social networking media such as Facebook and Twitter, but I would like to continue my earlier goal of compiling my photography.
It has taken me quite some time but I have just about archived all my posts from my old site into WordPress. I still have a lot of cleaning up to do as most of the images are not working but I will rectify that as I quickly as I can
With the archiving done I can do a couple of things – Firstly I can write new content without stressing about the URI link being broken and secondly I can clean up the whole site and remove the dead files and older WordPress/self built CMS/image gallery applications and start from scratch. It seems like a great way to start a new decade.
Also, I can work on the new template (which I’d already designed but haven’t built). It would be nice to have this completed by tomorrow because I’ve used New Year’s Day to launch new designs in the past so it feels appropriate.
I’m certainly not planning on spending NYE working on the computer so that last part may be a stretch but you never know your luck.
I’ve been archiving my old pre-WordPress posts lately and notice that I pretty much haven’t written anything since January.
Well, it’s now the first day of August so I thought I should do something about that and (drum roll please) … here we go.
Not that this post promises to be any kind of literary masterpiece, I just want to write a few things and set some goals for this site.
I guess like many of my friends who used to blog in the “old days” I no longer do so because the reasons I blog are to allow my family and friends to catch up with what is going on with my life. However in this day of social networking sites and web 2.0 I really don’t need to do so. If I want my family to know what’s happening in my life I update my Facebook page, or more accurately – Lia updates HER Facebook page!
People who write technical blogs or current events blogs have an ongoing reason to do so.
If I want an ongoing reason to continue this blog then I clearly need to think outside the immediate “my life” social sort of writing and find a clear purpose. I sometimes write posts of a technical nature but not very often.
Photography is the obvious potential for this site. In the past I concentrated on a mix of personal and photo blogging and it’s clearly a natural progression to move back towards the origins with a heavier leaning on the photoblog.
I’ve been putting the archives into WordPress because I really like the way it’s evolved. Version 3 is very cool and, as I write WordPress templates commercially, it makes sense to concentrate on it rather than using a number of different applications.
Sure, I can see a need for photo galleries such as Plogger which I’ve used extensively but in most cases using the default gallery in WordPress along with the lightbox-plus plugin produces a better result. I may also need to use a more targeted application for my clients if the need arises but for this site it’s not necessary.
Once I’ve archived all my old posts (which is going to take some time) I’ll look at rebuilding and redesigning this whole site.
Thanks to my shiny white teeth I’d like to promote this latest service…
No, not really!
As some of you may have noticed last week my Facebook status was updated some time before I woke up on 28th December with what was clearly an ad for teeth whitening.
I am still baffled as to how this information was placed on my profile page as I consider myself to be careful with my passwords. It’s interesting to note that the page was updated from the Facebook mobile portal which I don’t use due to the high cost of Internet access with my current GSM carrier. Shortly after I discovered and deleted the status I also changed my password to something even more secure.
But passwords are not the only weak link in your profile, the third party applications that you authorise to access your page can also cause problems and some app writers do not provide adequate security for your data. Commercial provider of some applications for Facebook and MySpace, Rock You, looks like it’s going to be hit with a class action after a breach of their security
I don’t add many applications to my profile because I don’t like the authorisation you need to give them but this is not the only area that people are lax in their security. A really common practice on many sites is allowing users to easily find their friends online by providing their Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail or MSN email address and password.
There are two problems with this. Firstly you are trusting the site you’re on to do the right thing with your password and secondly (and possibly more importantly) you’re building up complacency with your password so that, when logging into a site you don’t know or haven’t even heard of before, you have no issues with providing your email address and password as if it means nothing at all.
If you think your email address doesn’t mean anything to you and this is not an issue you’re wrong. Access to your email means access to many other things that you use online. Think about all your contacts, subscriptions, website memberships, banking and anything else you’ve handed your email address to and think what would happen if someone maliciously went through everything you did so you were no longer in control of your identity.
I never use these “find friends” systems and while I strongly recommend that you don’t either I accept that they can serve their purpose. If you are going to use them then make sure that it’s on a site that you know or consider to have integrity.
I’ve been following for quite a while now, the debate regarding the government decision to introduce a filter that will block certain websites from being accessed by users in Australia. If you are unaware of this then you’re not alone as mainstream media, while not disregarding the issue, is not paying a lot of attention to it either.
The idea behind the filter sounds good in theory. Lets protect our children from some of the nasties that are on the Internet as well as making sure that content that would be Refused Classification by the Australian Communications and Media Authority is not available. The main focus of the “Refused Classification” push in selling this idea to the Australian public is child pornography but RC does not just cover illegal or immoral material.
There is already a wide range of content that is refused classification with computer games over a MA15+ rating being the one of the most obvious one. As there are many reasons for something to be “Refused Classification” and not just issues of legality, there is still a lot of material that could be considered RC but still legal to view so the argument starts to break down here. If that’s the case, why does Senator Stephen Conroy, the minister for Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy think it’s such a great idea.
The answer in this case appears to be vote buying from conservative Christian political parties. It’s also a long way from the opt in filter that was proposed before the election in 2007. No opt out filtered internet [computerworld.com.au]
So while the ideology behind the filter is a great in principle the whole plan is flawed. I have yet to read an article, letter to the editor or blog post from one technical expert that agrees with the report that states that the filter will not impact on Internet speed and cost.
By far though, the biggest criticism is that the filter does not address the areas that are actually a problem, such as Peer to Peer networks, Instant Messenger services and a whole range of other Internet protocols such as VPN or proxy servers. Furthermore any websites that contain material that is questionable is most likely to have already been shut down by the time it makes it to the filter list or will change URL’s to bypass the block.
To fully prevent access to the kind of content that Sen. Conroy is wanting, a much harsher filtering regime would be required –
“Implementing a simple ‘black-list’ filter can never work – just ask the Chinese and the highly porous “Great Firewall of China.” What we need to do is become much more aggressive. Here’s how.”
David Heath – IT Wire http://www.itwire.com/content/view/30175/1239/
As mentioned already, as the filter only affects http traffic (or the World Wide Web), the physical location of the server and the traffic on it is fairly easy to trace, so reporting websites that may contain questionable material is most likely to have already been reported to law enforcement agencies and shut down. All this before it even makes it to the filter list.
Websites on the list would be easy to view (by the governments own admission) by using a proxy server to access the content. If you think this sounds difficult, it isn’t – Just ask any teenager http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/technology/newsid_10000000/newsid_10003500/10003579.stm
You should be afraid that the government is going to censor the Internet. This is a secret list and you will not know what content is on it and any claim by the government that they absolutely will not use the list for anything except RC material should be taken as a politicians promise.
Do you trust your government, or any government for that matter, to act 100% in the best interest of the people regardless of their own interests. At what point does this secret list expand to include material that is damaging to the government. It concerns me is that the truth of a politician is often different to actual truth, twisted, using clever and subtly crafted language. Furthermore, a truth now may not be the same “truth” in the future. Open letter to Australia’s Prime Minister [rsf.org]
Obviously the need to keep the list a secret is to protect people however the original testing blacklist was leaked and many media outlets were able to obtain copies. The list has not been made public as it “constitutes a condensed encyclopedia of depravity and potentially very dangerous material” and would be “the concerned parent’s worst nightmare as curious children would inevitably seek it out.”
“But about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.” http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html [smh.com.au]
If you think that the government will not censor any website other than the RC categories that they are claiming, consider the fate of protest website stephenconway.com.au. Online for just two days this site was taken down by the auDA, the policy authority and industry self-regulatory body for the .au domain space. The auDA state that they removed the domain after an internal check and that no request from the government was made however the biggest concern is the speed in which the domain was disabled.
To register an .au domain you need to have a legitimate reason for using the domain. Sapia Pty Ltd, who registered the domain could argue political parody as close substantial relationship but that would be highly unlikely to be acceptable. The auDA argue that the domain does not meet the criteria of an .au domain registration and took the domain down. This is not unjustifiable as their role is to protect the .au domain space from incorrect domain registrations.
If you’re not with us…
As this filter plan is currently drawing heavy fire from bloggers, networking technicians, ISP’s and many ordinary people, the government is choosing to deflect any criticism of its plans by suggesting that being against the filter must mean that you’re a pervert or you have some underlying reason for wanting to visit this kind of content. poll results [smh.com.au]
This is simply not the case as most people who raise concerns base it on technical reasons or a fear that government will use it for other censorship is that, once in place, the filters will damage our ability to successfully access the Internet, that some sites that are legitimate may become unavailable if the government does not agree with the viewpoints. Euthanasia, abortion and religious views certainly could be amongst such sites.
Clearly this was good thinking by the parents but as Facebook was used as a vessel for child exploitation it’s clear that, for the governments filter to be effective, social networking sites such as Facebook and myspace will need to be blocked.
Of course it’s unlikely this will actually happen because these sites are too prolific for them to suddenly disappear so it begs the question – If a child is more likely to make contact with a predator on a site like Facebook than accidentally stumble across child pornography on the Internet, what is the validity of having a filter. Wouldn’t it be better to use the money invested in this to pro-actively target people who are engaging in this kind of activity.
Facebook, like other large portals will protect their interests by protecting their users from dangerous content or nefarious users. Facebook gives sex offenders the boot [msn.com]